Brent Crude Surges Past $92 as US Launches Fresh Strikes on Iran, Reigniting Strait of Hormuz Supply Fears

Brent crude futures rose $1.84, or 2.0%, to $92.85 a barrel at 0630 GMT on July 22, 2026, after the United States announced a new round of military strikes against Iran. West Texas Intermediate climbed $1.67, also 2.0%, to $86.01 a barrel over the same session, Reuters reported.
The intraday picture confirms sustained buying pressure rather than a gap-and-fade. Brent's last-day financial contract (BZ=F) opened at $91.51 and touched $92.66 on July 22, Yahoo Finance data shows. Trading Economics recorded Brent spot at $92.10, up 1.20% from the prior close, with a 19.49% gain over the trailing 30 days and 34.44% over its longer comparison window, Trading Economics notes.
The trajectory has been steep but uneven. Brent opened at $84.89 on July 17 with a session high of $88.32. By July 21, it opened at $88.89 and reached $91.97, per Yahoo Finance historical data. The move caps a dramatic reversal from earlier in the month. On July 9, Brent settled at $76.30, down $1.72 or 2.2%, as demand-side economic worries temporarily outweighed supply risk; WTI settled at $72, down $1.44 or 2.0%, Reuters reported. The following session, July 10, Brent slipped another 29 cents to $76.01 and WTI lost 67 cents to $71.41, Reuters noted.
The pivot came on July 13. Brent futures surged 9.6% to settle at $83.30, the largest daily percentage gain for the international benchmark in the session, WSJ reported. The catalyst was escalating concern that the Iran war was far from over. The next day, July 14, the United States reimposed a naval blockade on Iran, which Reuters reported would reduce oil flows, Reuters stated.
The conflict itself dates to earlier in 2026. The United States launched military strikes against Iran, with Reuters reporting fresh strikes as early as July 9. The Strait of Hormuz has been effectively closed or severely restricted for months. Goldman Sachs estimated that Persian Gulf oil flows retreated to the low-70s percentage range of normal capacity amid the conflict, Reuters reported. Back on March 22, Brent May futures settled up 3.26% at $112.19, the highest level since July 2022, Reuters noted.
The EIA's data adds context on how far prices have come and how volatile the path has been. The Brent spot price averaged $85 per barrel in June 2026, down $22 from May and down $32 from its April 2026 peak, according to EIA STEO data. That April peak coincided with S&P Global Ratings raising its 2026 price assumptions to $95/bbl for WTI and $100/bbl for Brent, citing longer-than-expected persistence of supply disruptions, as S&P Global Ratings published on April 29.
Forecasts diverge sharply. J.P. Morgan Global Research published a bearish outlook expecting Brent to average around $60 per barrel for 2026 despite the recent spike, J.P. Morgan noted. The Brookings Institution estimated that a 10% decline in oil supply between the start of the Iran war and June 2026 could push Brent to $120 per barrel, Brookings observed.
The spread between these scenarios, $60 versus $120, reflects a genuine binary hinge on Strait of Hormuz throughput. Goldman's low-70s flow figure suggests partial disruption, not a full chokepoint. If the naval blockade tightens further and flows drop toward the Brookings 10% threshold, the upper bound becomes the operative path. If a ceasefire or de-escalation restores throughput, the J.P. Morgan case, predicated on demand destruction and economic slowdown, comes back into play.
For hedging desks and corporate Treasury teams, the July 9-10 dip to $76 followed by the July 13 explosion to $83.30 in a single session captures the regime: supply shocks are arriving in discrete political-military events rather than gradual tightening. Option-implied volatility around these news events has likely repriced sharply, though we do not have verified vols to confirm that.
The $92 level now puts Brent within $8 of S&P Global's $100 Brent assumption. Whether the market sustains this level or mean-reverts toward the June $85 average depends on whether the latest US strikes are a tactical escalation or a step toward broader closure of remaining Gulf flows. That distinction is not yet knowable from the public record.


