Politics

What happened when Luxon and Hipkins went head-to-head in Parliament this week

Hana SinclairPublished 2month ago4 min readBased on 9 sources
Reading level
What happened when Luxon and Hipkins went head-to-head in Parliament this week
Photo by Office of the Governor-General (New Zealand) / CC BY-SA 4.0

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has dismissed as "ridiculous" a claim from Labour leader Chris Hipkins that he called his own National Party MPs "no better than a bunch of Air New Zealand middle managers" at a private event with businesspeople in Auckland.

The clash happened during a Tuesday afternoon debate in Parliament about the sacking of Chris Penk from Cabinet. Hipkins told MPs that Luxon had insulted his own colleagues to the Auckland business group, but admitted he had no proof. He said an Auckland businessperson told him about it "a couple of years ago" and he was taking that person at their word.

Luxon denied it outright. "It's not something I would say," he told Parliament, accusing Hipkins of trying to create a distraction. RNZ

The next day, during Question Time — the daily session where MPs ask ministers questions — Hipkins pushed further. He asked Luxon when he first found out that his colleagues wanted to replace him as leader. The questions were aimed at keeping attention on a failed attempt to roll Luxon as National's leader, which he survived. Luxon had called National MPs to an urgent meeting at Parliament to deal with what he called "speculation" about his leadership. NZ Herald

National minister Chris Bishop stood up twice to try to stop Hipkins' questioning, arguing it was a party matter, not a government one. His efforts drew jeers from the opposition. RNZ

Hipkins also asked Luxon whether he agreed with NZ First leader Winston Peters' description of National MPs as "inexperienced, egotistical and self-obsessed." Luxon replied: "No, I think he may have had his Chrises mixed up" — a joke about the fact that he and Hipkins share the same first name.

Peters has publicly doubted that the attempt to replace Luxon was a one-man effort, according to the New Zealand Herald. NZ Herald

Luxon tried to steer things back to his preferred topic, saying Hipkins was under pressure because he wants to bring in nine new taxes. Hipkins wants the election to be about himself, Luxon said, while Luxon wants it to be about taxes and New Zealanders.

Hipkins has not let up. Earlier in the week, RNZ reported him calling Luxon incompetent and describing National's attacks on Labour's tax plans as "hysterical." RNZ At a campaign stop in Rotorua, Hipkins announced an AI start-up support plan for small businesses and jumped on a comment Luxon had made telling businesses to "be adult." NZ Herald And when a poll put pressure on his own leadership, Hipkins called it a "rogue poll" from a "right-wing lobby group." The Conversation

The broader context here is that both leaders are dealing with pressure inside their own parties that they would rather not talk about publicly. Luxon survived his leadership challenge but has not fixed the unhappiness behind it. The fact that Hipkins could use it against him in Parliament two days running, and that Bishop felt the need to step in and block the questioning, says something about how much control National has over its own MPs right now. Peters' public doubt about the "one-man coup" adds a coalition partner's voice to those concerns.

For his part, Hipkins is focused on making Luxon the story. Whether the Auckland anecdote — unverified, offered without proof and based on a second-hand account from years ago — was a deliberate gamble or a mistake is something for political observers to judge. What is clear is that both leaders are trying to keep attention on the other's weaknesses rather than their own policies, and Question Time this week gave both of them plenty to work with.