World

Why a US Ambassador's Visit to Kashmir Upset Pakistan

Elena MarquezPublished 4w ago5 min readBased on 10 sources
Reading level
Why a US Ambassador's Visit to Kashmir Upset Pakistan
Photo by Shealeah Craighead / Public domain

Pakistan called in the top US diplomat in its capital on August 20, 2026, to formally complain about comments made by US Ambassador to India Sergio Gor. During a visit to the region of Kashmir, Gor described it as "an important part of India" (Al Jazeera).

Kashmir is a mountainous area that both India and Pakistan claim as their own. The dispute over who controls it goes back to 1947, when British colonial rule ended in the region and the two countries were created. Gor's trip to Srinagar and Ladakh was the first standalone visit by a serving US ambassador to the area since 2019 (Al Jazeera).

Gor, a 38-year-old former Trump aide confirmed as ambassador in January 2026, also serves as President Donald Trump's special envoy for South and Central Asia. He made the remarks publicly alongside Omar Abdullah, the top elected official of Jammu and Kashmir. During the visit, Gor said Washington was reconsidering its "do not travel" advisory for the region, citing improved security under Abdullah's administration. The current State Department advisory places Jammu and Kashmir at "Do Not Travel," citing terrorism and civil unrest, while exempting the eastern territories of Ladakh and Leh (Al Jazeera).

Pakistan lodged a formal diplomatic protest — called a "demarche" — with Natalie Baker, the senior US diplomat who heads the American mission in Pakistan. The Foreign Ministry rejected calling Kashmir a "part of India," restating its position that the territory is internationally recognised as disputed. That means the international community has not settled who rightfully owns it. Pakistan says the matter should be resolved under United Nations Security Council resolutions, which are formal decisions by the UN's most powerful body. Pakistan called Gor's remarks factually incorrect and said they contradicted Washington's longstanding position on the dispute (Al Jazeera).

Pakistan also thanked Trump for his offer to help resolve the Kashmir question, first made after India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire ending their four-day war last year. Pakistan urged Washington to keep its public language consistent with that offer. Trump had called the rising tensions between the two countries a "shame" at the time of those strikes in May 2025 (Reuters). He had previously said, as far back as January 2020, that the United States was watching developments "very closely" and was prepared to help (Reuters).

The two countries have responded differently to US involvement. Pakistan has repeatedly thanked Trump for his offer to mediate, while India has not acknowledged any role for a third party in the dispute (Reuters).

In 2019, India stripped Jammu and Kashmir of its autonomy — a special status that had allowed the region to make many of its own laws — and reorganised it into two "union territories," which are areas governed directly by the central government in New Delhi. Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs maintains an official page titled "Jammu and Kashmir Dispute" affirming that UN Security Council resolutions uphold the right of Kashmiris to self-determination, meaning the people of Kashmir should get to decide their own future (Pakistan MOFA). At a meeting of the OIC, a group of Muslim-majority countries, Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister stated that resolving the dispute in accordance with those resolutions is essential for lasting peace in South Asia (Pakistan MOFA).

The broader context here is a shift in how the US approaches Kashmir under the Trump administration. An ambassador-level visit to Srinagar, delivered in a public setting alongside an Indian regional leader, sends a signal that goes beyond routine diplomacy. The US State Department had previously condemned terrorist attacks on Indian security forces in the region "in the strongest terms" (State Department), and Gor's remarks about easing the travel advisory suggest the US is moving toward treating the region as normal.

For Pakistan, the stakes are direct. Islamabad's entire diplomatic strategy on Kashmir rests on the territory being internationally disputed and on the applicability of UN Security Council resolutions. Any US language that treats Kashmir as an integral part of India weakens that strategy. Pakistan's Foreign Ministry has separately issued statements expressing concern over tourist casualties in Anantnag district (Pakistan MOFA) and has criticised the Indian Prime Minister's podcast remarks as "misleading and one-sided" for omitting the Kashmir dispute (Pakistan MOFA).

The protest on August 20 is, in effect, Pakistan's demand that Washington reconcile its mediation offer with its ambassador's words. Whether the State Department adjusts its language, clarifies Gor's remarks, or lets them stand will signal how the Trump administration intends to balance its relationships with New Delhi and Islamabad. Pakistan's annual Kashmir Solidarity Day and its consistent messaging at international forums like the OIC indicate that this is not a temporary objection but a core foreign policy position from which Islamabad shows no sign of retreating (Pakistan MOFA).