A former neo-Nazi stood down as a Tory council candidate — here's what happened

Joshua Bonehill-Paine, a former neo-Nazi activist with convictions for antisemitic offences and racial harassment, has withdrawn as a Conservative candidate for a council election in Somerset after a backlash (BBC News).
Bonehill-Paine had been selected as the Conservative candidate for a Somerset council election, first reported on 3 August (The Guardian). He announced he was stepping down on 5 August, ending a candidacy that had been criticised across the political spectrum (BBC News).
His criminal record is well documented. Bonehill-Paine was jailed in 2015 after posting antisemitic remarks ahead of a planned neo-Nazi rally (BBC News). A year after his jailing, he was convicted of racially harassing then-Labour MP Luciana Berger (BBC News). During that episode, he called the Jewish parliamentarian an "evil money-grabber" (Times of Israel). He has also been identified as the creator of the satirical Crewkerne Gazette (The Guardian).
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch defended the initial selection, arguing that Bonehill-Paine had been rehabilitated and that the party believes in second chances (BBC News). Badenoch went further, offering him a position as an adviser to the Conservative Party's Culture and Integration Commission, focusing on how young men become radicalised (BBC News).
Bonehill-Paine himself described his past views as indefensible and said he has spent years opposing antisemitism since leaving prison (BBC News). He has separately said he has changed after prison (Times of Israel). Before his withdrawal, he had indicated he would rally young people to support the election of Mark Shelford, the Police & Crime Commissioner candidate for Avon & Somerset (BBC Politics, Facebook).
The broader context here is about how political parties check the backgrounds of people who want to stand for election. In British politics, local council candidates are chosen by party volunteers in each area, though the party's national headquarters can step in. Council elections in England are run at the local level — councillors represent towns or neighbourhoods within a wider council area.
Badenoch's defence of the selection, framed around rehabilitation and second chances, put that philosophy in the public eye. The withdrawal will test whether that argument can hold up when a candidate's criminal record comes under media scrutiny. The advisory role she offered him, on a commission looking at culture and integration, raises a separate question: whether someone's personal experience of extremism can be useful to a party without costing it reputation.
For local Conservatives in Somerset, the episode is unwelcome disruption. The involvement of a candidate with multiple hate-crime convictions in a campaign connected to a Police & Crime Commissioner adds another layer of difficulty. PCCs are elected officials who oversee how police forces engage with their communities — on precisely the sort of offences Bonehill-Paine committed.
The withdrawal does not erase the questions the episode has raised about the party's vetting procedures, Badenoch's judgment in defending the selection, or the tension between giving people a second chance and choosing candidates who can withstand public scrutiny. Whether the advisory role on the Culture and Integration Commission remains open to Bonehill-Paine after his withdrawal as a candidate is a question the party has not yet publicly addressed.


