Kenney and Notley Co-Chair Chamber Campaign Against Alberta Separation Referendum
The Canadian Chamber of Commerce has enlisted former Alberta premiers Jason Kenney and Rachel Notley as co-chairs of a campaign to keep Canada united, as Albertans prepare to vote in an October 19 referendum on whether the province should remain in the federation or hold a second, binding vote on leaving it.
The pairing brings together two political adversaries who faced each other across the legislature aisle. Kenney, who led the United Conservative Party to victory over Notley's NDP government in 2019, has been an outspoken critic of the separatist push throughout the summer of 2025. Notley, who served as premier from 2015 until Kenney's win, has blamed Premier Danielle Smith's UCP government for advancing what she calls a separatist agenda on Albertans.
The referendum scheduled for October 19 asks voters whether Alberta should remain in Canada or proceed to a second, binding referendum on quitting the country. The Smith government's decision to put the question to a vote has elevated a movement that Kenney describes as fringe, one he argues threatens to undermine the resolution of legitimate provincial grievances with the federal government.
Chamber president Candace Laing framed the campaign in economic terms. Canada, she said, will be better off with greater economic co-operation, not less, amid geopolitical and economic uncertainty reshaping global trade and investment. The Chamber said the campaign will demonstrate that a prosperous Alberta includes Canada.
Notley said she and Kenney agree the separation referendum is bad for business and poorly timed, given the ongoing trade war with the United States. The two former premiers, who disagree on most policy matters, have converged on the view that the referendum itself carries costs the province cannot afford at a moment of trade instability.
Kenney's involvement carries particular weight within conservative circles in Alberta. He built the UCP by merging the Progressive Conservative and Wildrose parties, in part to wall off the kind of western alienation that has now metastasized into an open separatist movement under his successor. His condemnation of the push over the summer of 2025 signalled to federalist conservatives that opposition to the referendum is not a partisan stance. Notley's co-chairship extends that signal across the NDP base, giving the campaign a bipartisan Alberta credential that few other pairings could match.
The campaign's details remain in development. The Chamber said specifics are still being worked out and will be driven by discussions between the co-chairs and members. What is clear is the institutional weight behind it: the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, the country's largest business association, is putting its organizational capacity behind two former premiers to make the case for unity in a province where the governing party has committed to giving separatism a ballot question.
The broader context here is one that Canadians who follow federal-provincial dynamics will recognize. Alberta's grievances are not new: equalization, pipeline approval processes, energy policy built in Ottawa without provincial consent. These are the "legitimate provincial grievances" Kenney referenced. His argument is not that Alberta has no cause for complaint, but that a separatist referendum distracts from resolving those grievances and hands ammunition to those who would portray the province as unserious. Notley's alignment on that point, while assigning blame to Smith rather than the federal government, narrows the political space in which the referendum campaign can be framed as a simple Ottawa-versus-Calgary fight.
The October 19 vote will not itself separate Alberta from Canada. It asks whether the province should hold a second, binding referendum on leaving. But the first referendum's political function is as a signal: if Albertans endorse proceeding, the pressure on both the Smith government and Ottawa escalates dramatically. That is the outcome the Chamber's campaign, under Kenney and Notley, is designed to prevent.
For the business community, the calculation is straightforward. A province openly debating secession during a trade war with its largest trading partner is a harder sell for investment capital than one pressing its case within the federation. Laing's emphasis on economic co-operation positions the campaign not as a defence of the constitutional status quo, but as a pragmatic argument about where Alberta's economic interests lie.
The campaign's effectiveness will depend on whether two former premiers, one conservative and one social democratic, can persuade Albertans that the ballot question Smith has put before them is one the province would be better off voting down.
