Politics

Badenoch's Gestapo Comparison Draws Rebuke From Labour — and Cleverly

Eleanor WhitcombePublished 2month ago3 min readBased on 3 sources
Reading level
Badenoch's Gestapo Comparison Draws Rebuke From Labour — and Cleverly

Kemi Badenoch compared Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson to a Gestapo officer, telling the Spectator that Phillipson had "acted like a Gestapo officer" in the way she was closing down private schools that did not meet certain criteria — a reference to the government's decision to end the VAT exemption on independent school fees, which has precipitated closures across the sector.

The remarks, made at Prime Minister's Questions and subsequently elaborated upon in the Spectator interview, drew immediate condemnation from Labour. Ministers said Badenoch was "not fit to be prime minister." The comparison lands at a politically sensitive moment for the Conservative leadership: Nazi analogies applied to domestic policy disputes have a poor track record in British politics, and the Opposition benches are the last place a leader can afford a story that invites questions about judgment rather than the government's record.

The most telling signal came not from Labour but from within the Conservative family. BBC News reported that James Cleverly — who ran against Badenoch in last year's Conservative leadership contest — said he would not have used the Gestapo comparison himself. Cleverly's formulation was pointed precisely because it stopped short of explicit condemnation while leaving no ambiguity about his view. For a former party rival to volunteer that distancing in public is the kind of thing that circulates in whips' offices long after the news cycle has moved on.

Badenoch has not withdrawn the remark. Her stated rationale — that Phillipson's enforcement of the new private school registration and inspection requirements amounted to something coercive enough to warrant the analogy — reflects a broader Conservative argument that Labour is using regulatory machinery to drive independent schools out of existence rather than simply taxing them. That argument has genuine political traction in some quarters. The framing chosen to advance it does not.

The substance of the policy dispute is real enough. The government's removal of the VAT exemption on private school fees, in force since the start of the 2025 academic year, has increased costs for many independent schools and their families. Some smaller schools have closed; others have raised fees sharply. The Conservatives have positioned themselves as defenders of parental choice, and Phillipson has become the focus of that attack. Whether a Gestapo comparison advances that case or simply displaces it is the question Badenoch's own side is now, quietly, asking.

The episode also carries a structural awkwardness for an opposition leader. PMQs is the one weekly forum in which the Leader of the Opposition has the despatch box to herself, and the government is obliged to answer. Using it to introduce a comparison that then becomes the story — rather than the policy — hands the government a defensive argument it would struggle to manufacture on its own. Labour did not need to make the case against Badenoch on the schools question on 28 June; Badenoch's own language made it for them.

Cleverly's public distancing is unlikely to be the last word from Conservative figures reluctant to own the comparison. The question for Badenoch's operation is whether the story runs into the week or closes quickly. That depends, in part, on whether she chooses to clarify, modify or simply hold the line — and on whether Phillipson or the Prime Minister opt to keep it alive from the despatch box.