World

Lebanese Army Accuses Israel of Obstructing Southern Withdrawal Pilot Zones

Elena MarquezPublished 5d ago5 min readBased on 5 sources
Reading level
Lebanese Army Accuses Israel of Obstructing Southern Withdrawal Pilot Zones

The Lebanese Armed Forces accused Israel on July 26, 2026 of obstructing its deployment to the first of three "pilot zone" villages in southern Lebanon, stating that continued Israeli shelling, bulldozing, and clearance operations were preventing Lebanese troops from fully assuming security control as agreed under a US-backed ceasefire framework.

The Lebanese military's statement, issued on Sunday, said the Israeli army was conducting combing operations with machine guns, bulldozing terrain, and shelling across at least ten localities in the south: Nabatieh, Hdda, Kunin, Bint Jbeil, Nabi Ibel al-Saqi, Khiam, al-Mansouri, Bayt al-Siyad, and Majdal Zoun in Tyre. A water project in Markaba was blown up, according to the army, and olive trees and farmland on the outskirts of Aitaroun were razed (Al Jazeera).

The three villages designated for the first phase of Israeli withdrawal are Zawtar al-Gharbiya, Froun, and Srifa. Lebanese troops deployed to the first village, Zawtar al-Gharbiya, on July 21. The Israeli army withdrew to the edge of the village but conditioned further movement on the dismantling of Hezbollah, according to the Lebanese military's account. During the July 21 deployment, Israeli forces fired near Lebanese army units, and the Lebanese army warned at the time that the incident could obstruct the process (Reuters).

As of July 26, parts of western Zawtar, Tibnit, and Nabatieh al-Fawqa were still experiencing Israeli gunfire even as displaced civilians returned home. Al Jazeera correspondent Zeina Khodr reported from Zawtar al-Gharbiya that returning residents found their houses reduced to rubble.

The pilot zone framework traces back to a ceasefire agreement that included a provision to swiftly advance the creation of zones in which the Lebanese Armed Forces would take exclusive security control (Reuters). Lebanon and Israel concluded US-brokered talks on the pilot zones in Rome on July 15 (Reuters). The Israeli military announced on July 20 that it had begun a pilot programme for safe zones in southern Lebanon in cooperation with US and Lebanese partners (Reuters). The broader withdrawal agreement was signed the previous month under US auspices.

The deployment also unfolded against a backdrop of renewed hostilities. Fighting in Lebanon erupted again in March 2026 after Hezbollah fired rockets at Israel in response to the US-Israel war on Iran and the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. As of July 26, the latest round of violence had killed at least 4,330 people in Lebanon, along with 37 Israeli soldiers and 4 Israeli civilians (Al Jazeera).

Hezbollah has rejected the US-brokered deal and demanded Israel's unconditional exit from southern Lebanon. That position creates a structural tension at the heart of the pilot zone arrangement: the agreement calls for the Lebanese Armed Forces to take exclusive control of designated areas, but Israel's condition for completing its withdrawal is Hezbollah's dismantlement, which is outside the Lebanese army's authority to deliver and which Hezbollah itself refuses.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun visited US President Donald Trump in Washington the week of July 19 to press for American pressure on Israel to comply with the withdrawal agreement. The visit came just days before the pilot zone deployment began, and the Lebanese army's July 26 statement amounts to a public assessment that compliance has not been forthcoming.

The scale of ongoing Israeli operations across the ten identified localities suggests that what was framed as a phased, cooperative handover is functioning more as a contested overlap. Lebanese troops have entered one of three designated villages. Israeli forces, meanwhile, continue active military operations, including demolition of infrastructure and destruction of agricultural land, across a far wider swath of southern territory than the pilot zone framework encompasses. Civilian returns are proceeding in parallel with live fire in Tibnit, Nabatieh al-Fawqa, and western Zawtar, raising immediate questions about the safety guarantees the pilot zones were designed to provide.

The coming days will likely determine whether the pilot zone mechanism survives its first real test or joins the list of ceasefire arrangements in this conflict that have been agreed in principle but eroded in implementation.