World

Trump Demands Oil Majors Return War-Inflated Profits as Combined Earnings Top $26 Billion

Elena MarquezPublished 5d ago5 min readBased on 8 sources
Reading level
Trump Demands Oil Majors Return War-Inflated Profits as Combined Earnings Top $26 Billion
Photo by Shealeah Craighead / Public domain

Donald Trump on August 4, 2026 publicly rebuked ExxonMobil and Chevron for reaping extraordinary profits from the oil-price disruption caused by the US-Iran war, telling reporters at the White House that the companies should return some of those earnings to the public and cut consumer prices immediately.

"They're making too much money based on a shortage. I don't like it," Trump said, according to The Guardian. He named both companies directly: "Chevron, too much money. ExxonMobil, too much money. They're going to give some of that back to the public and they better cut the retail price, the consumer price."

The remarks came as the two largest US oil majors reported combined profits exceeding $26 billion for the quarter ending June 2026. Chevron posted its highest-ever quarterly profit of $12.2 billion, a fivefold increase year-over-year. ExxonMobil reported $14.5 billion for the second quarter, double its earnings from the same period in 2025 and its largest quarterly profit since the price spike that followed Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Hours after Trump's comments, BP reported its own quarterly profit had doubled to $5.7 billion.

The profit surge is directly tied to the trajectory of oil prices during the Iran conflict. Brent crude traded at approximately $70 a barrel before the first US-Israeli strikes at the end of February 2026. Prices soared to $126 by the end of April, then retreated to around $85 a barrel by August 4. That decline accelerated in early August after Trump said he would order US forces to hold off on new strikes against Iran; oil prices fell 7% to a three-week low on August 2 after Trump cancelled a planned attack on Iran, according to Reuters and AP.

Trump has been pressing the case on gasoline prices for weeks. In late June, he posted on Truth Social: "Gasoline Retailers must get their Prices down, IMMEDIATELY." He told journalists that the drop in oil prices during the administration's June peace talks with Iran should have pushed US petrol prices to $2.25 a gallon. As of early August 2026, AAA data showed US gasoline averaging $4.11 a gallon. The Trump administration has ordered the Justice Department to investigate potential price gouging in the retail energy sector.

Trump's August 4 comments followed an interview with Chevron CEO Mike Wirth, according to Al Jazeera, and came a day after his initial August 3 remarks chiding the oil companies. Reuters reported that Trump "blasted" the majors after they reported blowout second-quarter earnings, with the Iran war keeping crude elevated.

The political collision between the White House and oil majors was flagged as early as July 3, when Reuters reported that US oil companies were set to post their strongest quarterly profits in years, courting a possible clash with the president over pump prices. Oil prices had spiked on June 10 after Trump said the US would attack Iran "very hard" if no peace deal was reached.

The broader context here is a president who launched a war that sent crude soaring, and who now finds the resulting windfall accruing to companies whose earnings he considers excessive. The gap between Trump's asserted fair gasoline price of $2.25 and the actual AAA-reported average of $4.11 is enormous, and it reflects a structural lag: retail fuel prices respond to crude movements with a delay, and refining margins, distribution costs, and state-level taxes all sit between the barrel price and the pump. Whether public pressure alone can compress that gap is doubtful without statutory intervention, which the Justice Department price-gouging investigation may signal is under consideration.

For the oil majors, the political risk is real but the policy toolkit to claw back profits is limited absent congressional action. Windfall profit taxes require legislation, and the current Congress has shown little appetite for new levies on the energy sector. Trump's rhetorical strategy instead leans on public shaming and regulatory threat, an approach with mixed precedent. What is clear is that the Iran conflict's direct contribution to oil company earnings has created a politically awkward dynamic for an administration simultaneously running military operations and managing consumer anger at the pump.

The latest de-escalation signal, Trump's cancellation of a new attack on Iran and the consequent oil-price drop, may ease some of that pressure. But with Brent still at $85 and gasoline at $4.11, the gap between Trump's expectations and market realities remains wide.