Finance

How the Government Is Starting to Make Rules for Prediction Markets

Marcus SterlingPublished 2w ago5 min readBased on 9 sources
Reading level
How the Government Is Starting to Make Rules for Prediction Markets

How the Government Is Starting to Make Rules for Prediction Markets

What You Need to Know

Over the past year, a U.S. financial regulator called the CFTC has been moving steadily toward creating formal rules for prediction markets — platforms where people can buy and sell contracts based on whether something will happen. Think betting exchanges, but regulated like stock markets. In a span of thirteen months, from early 2025 through March 2026, the agency dropped an old plan to ban these markets entirely, issued warnings to a major platform called Kalshi, went to court to claim it has the authority to oversee them, and announced it will now write the actual rules.

What started as the agency reacting to a growing market is now becoming a proper regulatory framework.

What Is Kalshi, and Why Does the Government Care?

Kalshi is a prediction market where people can buy contracts that pay off if a specific event occurs — and pay nothing if it doesn't. The contracts work simply: if your event happens, the contract pays. If it doesn't, you lose what you paid. The CFTC described the mechanics in a notice published on March 16, 2026.

People trade contracts on many outcomes: election results, economic reports, and political events. The political contracts are what got regulators' attention. Lawmakers and officials worried about how these markets might affect elections or be manipulated, according to the CFTC's response to Congress in February 2025.

Kalshi operates under CFTC rules, much like a stock exchange does. The exchange has safeguards in place — for example, the right to cancel trades if something goes wrong, and rules to prevent people from taking such large positions that they could manipulate prices. Those position rules were filed with the CFTC in November 2024.

A Tiny Fine With a Big Message

On February 25, 2026, the CFTC's enforcement team issued a warning to Kalshi and fined it $2,246.36. Source: CFTC Press Release 9185-26.

The dollar amount is almost meaningless. A company like Kalshi would barely notice it. But enforcement actions are not always about the money — they are about creating an official record. The warning document itself is what matters. It tells Kalshi what the agency expects from it and sets a standard that other prediction market platforms will be measured against later. This is how regulators often work with new industries: issue a small, early warning to establish the ground rules before the industry gets much bigger.

Why the Government Changed Its Mind About Banning These Markets

Before the warning, the CFTC made a significant shift. On February 4, 2026, it withdrew a proposal it had made in 2024 that would have banned political and sports prediction contracts outright. It also dropped a temporary freeze it had placed on these platforms.

Withdrawing a ban proposal does not mean the government loves prediction markets. It means the agency decided that an outright prohibition was not the right approach — at least not yet. Instead of banning them, the CFTC is building a case for specific rules. That process requires gathering evidence, hearing from the industry and public, and creating a paper trail that would hold up if someone challenged it in court.

The Government Claims Jurisdiction

On February 17, 2026, the CFTC went to federal court to declare that it — not the SEC or state gambling regulators — has authority over prediction markets. Source: CFTC Press Release 9183-26.

This might sound like bureaucratic turf-warring, but it matters to real people. Which agency oversees a market determines what rules apply, how often companies are inspected, and what protections exist. If the CFTC is in charge, prediction market platforms have to follow the full set of rules that govern commodity exchanges — the same rulebook that applies to oil futures or currency trading. That means more scrutiny, but also more clarity about what is and is not allowed.

The Next Step: Writing the Actual Rules

On March 12, 2026, the CFTC announced it would begin accepting public comments on prediction markets as it prepares to write formal rules. This is the first phase of rule-writing. The agency is not proposing specific rules yet — it is gathering information, studies, and feedback from the public and industry. This process protects the rules from being challenged in court later, because the agency will have documented that it considered all the facts carefully.

The CFTC held roundtable discussions starting in February 2025 to hear from experts and market participants. The comment process announced in March is the formal legal step that turns those conversations into an official record.

All of this — the roundtable, the withdrawn ban, the court filing, the new comment process — tells a story. The CFTC is signaling that it believes prediction markets will exist under its watch, and it is now building the framework to govern them properly.

What This Means for You

We have seen this movie before. After the 2008 financial crisis, the CFTC took on new authority to regulate the swaps market — the market where large financial institutions make bets on interest rates and other things. It took years of roundtables, guidance, and gradual rules before that market settled into its permanent form. Prediction markets are much smaller, but the CFTC is using the same playbook: warn companies early about what to expect, establish clear authority, then write lasting rules.

For people involved in these markets — whether compliance officers at platforms or institutional traders — the immediate message is clear. The CFTC's February warning to Kalshi is the current standard for how to operate. The comment period on rules is the moment to make your voice heard about what should be allowed.

For the rest of us, regulatory clarity is worth something. A prediction market that operates under clear CFTC rules is less likely to be shut down tomorrow, which means the prices you see on these platforms should be more reliable. People worry less about headline risk when the rules are written down.

The $2,246.36 fine will be forgotten. But the regulatory framework it kicked off will shape how these markets work for years to come.