World

Why France's High School Students Have to Study Nietzsche

Elena MarquezPublished 2month ago3 min readBased on 1 source
Reading level
Why France's High School Students Have to Study Nietzsche

In June 2026, roughly 500,000 French teenagers sat down to answer philosophy questions about Nietzsche on the baccalauréat — a national exam that France requires all high school seniors to take. Nietzsche is one of the hardest philosophers to understand, and his inclusion sparked the kind of attention that only France reserves for this particular test.

In France, philosophy is not optional. Every student in the final year of high school must sit the bac philo — a three-hour exam where they write an essay answering one of several questions about a major thinker. The exam has been required since 1809. It is the first test of the national exam season and carries enormous weight in French culture. No other country quite does this. The New York Times reported on the 2026 exam on June 19.

Nietzsche's writing is deliberately difficult — short, punchy, impossible to summarize easily. That creates a real problem for French students because French schools teach philosophy essays in a very specific way: thesis, counter-thesis, and synthesis. The idea is to lay out a balanced argument. But Nietzsche explicitly rejected that kind of balanced thinking. So a Nietzsche question becomes a test of whether students can think freely, or whether they just memorize how to write a "good" essay.

That tension sits at the heart of a bigger debate in France. Some educators argue the exam just teaches students to write like philosophers without actually thinking like philosophers. Others say the whole point is that discipline — working through a hard problem for three hours with no books to rely on — forces real thinking. When Nietzsche shows up, both sides dig in harder, because you cannot fake your way through his ideas.

France's approach is unusual globally. In the United States, Canada, and most other developed countries, philosophy is an elective course if it is offered at all. France treats it as essential — part of what it means to be an educated citizen. The government sees philosophical reasoning as a basic skill for civic life, not as something only specialists need. Whether this actually works is unclear; researchers have not found definitive proof that French students reason better than others.

There is also a darker layer to teaching Nietzsche in France. His work was badly distorted by Nazi ideologues in the 1930s, and this misreading was spread by his own sister. Teaching him responsibly means explaining that history and the distortion. Most French philosophy teachers are trained to do this, but it adds complexity to an already demanding exam.

For students taking the test on June 15, the stakes were concrete. The philosophy grade counts toward the overall exam score, which determines whether students can enter France's most selective universities and preparatory programs. A strong philosophy result does not guarantee entry to these elite schools, but a weak one makes it much harder.

The full exam questions and results have not been officially released yet. Once they are, the annual debate will start again: Was it fair? Was it too hard? Do these exams actually test real thinking? That cycle happens every year, with or without Nietzsche.