Technology

Christopher Nolan's "The Odyssey" Made $264 Million in Its Opening Weekend, Using a Film Format No Movie Has Used Before

Martin HollowayPublished 2w ago4 min readBased on 6 sources
Reading level
Christopher Nolan's "The Odyssey" Made $264 Million in Its Opening Weekend, Using a Film Format No Movie Has Used Before

Christopher Nolan's "The Odyssey" grossed $264.1 million globally in its opening weekend after its July 17, 2026 release, with IMAX 70mm screenings sold out for weeks (The Verge, Variety). The domestic portion of that figure came in at $124 million, the third-biggest debut of the year (The Verge).

The film is an adaptation of Homer's nearly 3,000-year-old epic poem, directed by Nolan with Matt Damon as Odysseus and Bill Irwin as the Cyclops Polyphemus (The Verge). Production spanned locations across the world and employed brand-new IMAX film technology developed for the project (The Verge).

"The Odyssey" is the first feature film shot entirely with 70mm film IMAX cameras (The Verge). Two million feet of IMAX film stock were consumed in the process, yielding roughly 100 hours of footage at 24 frames per second (The Verge).

To understand why that is unusual, it helps to know what 70mm IMAX cameras are. Most movies today are shot digitally, but IMAX film cameras use physical film stock that is very wide (70mm, compared to the 35mm standard of older movies). The wider film captures far more visual detail. The trade-off is that these cameras are loud, heavy, and can only record about three minutes of footage per film load. Those limitations shape everything from where actors stand during a scene to how long a single take can run. Nolan's previous film, "Oppenheimer," mixed 70mm IMAX with conventional formats. Shooting an entire feature on the format, across multiple countries, goes well beyond that.

The exhibition strategy follows directly from that filming choice. Three different aspect ratios, meaning the proportional relationship between a screen's width and height, are in play depending on where you watch it. Standard IMAX screenings present the film at 1.90:1. 70mm IMAX prints open up to 1.43:1, filling the full height of the giant-screen canvas. 35mm screenings use a widescreen 2.39:1 crop (The Verge). The practical effect is that viewers in different venues see meaningfully different amounts of image area. The 70mm IMAX presentation delivers approximately 80% more vertical screen real estate than the standard digital IMAX version and roughly 2.4x the image area of the 35mm widescreen crop. The sell-out status of the 70mm IMAX screenings suggests audiences are not just passively accepting that differentiation but actively seeking it out.

The box office return validates the bet. A $264.1 million global opening for a three-hour literary adaptation with no franchise scaffolding is a commercial result that few properties outside established IP universes achieve. That it did so on the strength of a format most theaters cannot project, and a source text studied in middle school rather than consumed as entertainment, makes the financial performance worth noting beyond the raw number. The IMAX 70mm sell-outs functioned as a scarcity-driven demand signal. Whether the wider rollout sustains comparable per-screen velocity will be clearer in the coming weeks.

There is also a technical lineage worth tracking. IMAX Corporation has spent years developing quieter, more reliable 70mm camera mechanisms, and a production of this scale puts that hardware through the most sustained real-world stress test it has faced. If the new IMAX film technology used here performs reliably across a full feature shoot, it lowers the barrier for other directors considering the format. Kodak's continued production of motion-picture film stock is the upstream dependency that makes any of this possible. The supply chain for two million feet of 70mm stock is not something that scales on demand.

The downstream question for the industry is whether "The Odyssey" becomes the proof point that normalizes all-70mm-IMAX shooting for large-scale productions, or whether it remains an outlier enabled by a director with enough clout to absorb the cost and complexity. The answer likely depends on how the format premium translates into sustained theatrical attendance rather than opening-weekend curiosity.