The Guggenheim Sues to Reclaim a Picasso Stolen 65 Years Ago

A Picasso painting that vanished from the Guggenheim Museum in 1961 is now the subject of a lawsuit filed in New York State Supreme Court, with the museum demanding its return and US$3.5 million in damages from a Massachusetts couple who currently hold the work.
The painting is Femme dans un fauteuil ("Woman in an Armchair"), dated 1918. It was reported missing on 6 February 1961 while on loan to the Guggenheim, according to Artlyst. More than six decades later, the museum has traced the work to a private collection and gone to court to get it back.
Before filing suit, the Guggenheim repaid an insurance payout it had received after the theft, Newser reported. The repayment is a key legal move: by returning the insurance money, the museum asserts that it never surrendered ownership and remains the painting's lawful owner. Insurance payouts can complicate title — the legal right to a piece of property — because an insurer that pays a claim may acquire the rights to the lost item. Settling that debt clears the path for the original owner to press a recovery claim.
The lawsuit names a Massachusetts couple as defendants and was filed in New York State Supreme Court, as ARTnews reported on 14 August 2026. The Guggenheim is seeking both the physical return of the painting and the $3.5 million in damages. Hyperallergic confirmed the work's title and date in its reporting on 13 August.
Picasso painted Femme dans un fauteuil in 1918, a period when he was living in Paris and working in a post-cubist style that drew on classical portraiture. The painting's provenance — the documented chain of ownership from artist to current holder — will be central to the case. For stolen works, courts generally look at whether a current possessor knew or should have known the item was stolen, and how much time has passed.
The case joins a long list of recovery efforts by museums and individuals pursuing art looted or taken decades ago. What makes this one unusual is the gap: sixty-five years between theft and lawsuit, during which the painting apparently moved through private hands without public detection. How the couple acquired the work, and whether they were aware of its stolen status, will likely shape the court's decision.
The Guggenheim has not commented beyond the court filing. No hearing date has been publicly reported.


