Finance

Why This AI Fund Lost 10% in a Week — and What That Signals

Marcus SterlingPublished 2w ago7 min readBased on 1 source
Reading level
Why This AI Fund Lost 10% in a Week — and What That Signals

Why This AI Fund Lost 10% in a Week — and What That Signals

The Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund — ticker AIO — lost more than 10% of its stock price in just one week. That might seem like a routine market move, but what makes it worth watching is what the fund actually holds: stakes in private AI startups, including reportedly OpenAI, that ordinary investors can't buy on public stock exchanges.

AIO is a closed-end fund, or CEF — a type of investment vehicle that works differently from the mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) most people know. Instead of issuing new shares on demand, a CEF issues a fixed number of shares that trade on a stock exchange like regular stocks. That structural difference matters this week, and here's why.

How Closed-End Funds Work Differently

With a normal mutual fund or ETF, the price you pay tracks directly to the value of what's inside it. With a CEF, there's a permanent disconnect. The fund's shares trade on an exchange based on supply and demand — like any stock — so the price depends partly on how many people want to buy or sell right now, not just on what the holdings are worth.

Think of it like a painting: its true value is what experts say it's worth (net asset value, or NAV), but the price a buyer will pay on auction might be higher if everyone wants it, or lower if buyers are scarce. With AIO, the gap between what the fund says its holdings are worth and the price people will pay for its shares can swing around, especially when investor mood shifts.

When confidence in AI startups sours, sellers rush in. The share price falls — sometimes sharply — even if the fund hasn't yet adjusted its official valuation of those private companies downward. So you face a two-part hit: the 10% market-price drop is real, regardless of whether the fund's stated NAV has budged.

The Valuation Lag: Private Companies Move Slower

Here's where the CEF structure creates another wrinkle. When a CEF holds stocks in public companies, its NAV gets updated every trading day using market prices. When it holds private company stakes — like AIO does — valuations work differently. They're updated roughly once a quarter, using internal models, comparison deals, or independent appraisers. The clock ticks much more slowly.

This means the fund's reported NAV might look stable during market turmoil, even though everyone knows those private stakes have probably lost value. The valuation simply hasn't caught up yet. We saw this clearly in March 2020: business development companies and credit funds that hold private assets dropped 30–40% in market price, while their reported NAVs barely changed initially. When the appraisals came in the next quarter, they confirmed the market had been onto something, even if it had overreacted.

The 10%-plus drop in AIO this week may not yet show up in official NAV figures. The discount between market price and stated value might look even wider than it truly is — at least until the next quarterly appraisal round updates those private company marks.

Why AI Startups Are Especially Vulnerable Right Now

The broader picture: technology stocks, including private ones, have taken heavy hits recently. AI companies in particular are being reassessed as investors confront a harder reality. The excitement about AI's quick payoff is colliding with interest rates that remain high for longer than many hoped. Higher rates shrink the value of future profits, which matters most for companies that won't be profitable for years.

Private AI startups are especially exposed to this shift. Many have been valued at multiples of their revenue — meaning investors paid sky-high prices relative to what they actually earn — based on the belief that capital would stay cheap and founders would hit profitable exits quickly. OpenAI, if it's indeed in AIO's portfolio, has commanded some of the richest private valuations ever seen. Whether those price tags hold up through the next appraisal cycle is a genuine question.

To be clear: the 10% market-price decline is a fact. Investors actually sold shares at that discount. What it means for the true value of the private holdings is market opinion, not yet confirmed fact. Until AIO releases updated valuations reflecting current appraisals, we're watching the market's guess about private company values, not the actual revised marks.

Who Gets Hurt and Who Might Benefit

If you own AIO shares and sell now, that 10% loss is real — you've locked it in. If you're thinking of buying, the math changes. When a CEF's discount widens, you're theoretically acquiring the same underlying assets at a lower per-share price. But that only works out if you believe the private valuations will eventually reset closer to where the market is pricing them, and if you're patient enough to wait.

For people watching the markets, AIO's sharp weekly decline is a useful signal. The appraisal process — which formally updates NAV once a quarter — is slow. The public market, trading AIO's shares second by second, is fast. When a fund that explicitly packages private AI exposure drops 10% in a week, the market is essentially front-running a valuation adjustment that hasn't officially happened yet. It's saying: "We think these private AI companies are worth less than the fund's last official marks."

That market signal might be right, or it might overshoot. The next set of NAV reports will help answer that.

The Real Trade-Off in Accessing Private Markets

AIO exists to solve a real problem: private companies, especially in technology and AI, control an increasing share of the real value being created — yet most everyday investors can't buy stakes in them directly. A CEF like AIO offers a workaround. But there's a cost: the fund's shares trade on public exchanges based on sentiment and supply-demand, while the holdings inside are only revalued quarterly based on appraisals. That gap between fast public pricing and slow private revaluation is the price of the bridge.

It's not inherently good or bad. It depends on what you pay to enter, the quality of what you're actually buying, and whether you can tolerate the disconnect between your share price and the fund's reported value swinging around.

What this week's move makes clear is that the wrapper — the fund itself — does not insulate you from public market mood. Even though AIO holds private startups, its share price responds instantly to shifts in AI sentiment on public exchanges. When confidence in AI companies wavers on Wall Street, AIO's shareholders feel it right away — whether or not OpenAI or any other private holding's appraisal has changed yet.

As AI valuations continue to be tested in coming months, this transmission of public mood into private-access vehicles is worth tracking closely.