World

Nine Entertainment Posts $142M Profit as It Bets on Streaming, New Media Laws, and AI Licensing

Elena MarquezPublished 16h ago7 min readBased on 6 sources
Reading level
Nine Entertainment Posts $142M Profit as It Bets on Streaming, New Media Laws, and AI Licensing
Photo by Somogro Bangladesh on Pexels

Nine Entertainment reported a full-year net profit of $142 million from its continuing businesses, with EBITDA (a measure of operating profit that strips out interest, taxes, and some non-cash charges) rising 17% to $379 million. The growth was driven by its streaming service Stan and the newly acquired digital outdoor advertising company QMS. The results cover the year to 30 June 2026 and arrive as CEO Matt Stanton pushes an aggressive cost-cutting program while positioning the company to benefit from newly passed media bargaining legislation.

Australia's Parliament passed revamped media bargaining laws in the week before 26 August 2026. These laws clear the way for levies — essentially government-imposed charges — on global tech platforms like Google and Meta if they fail to strike commercial deals with Australian news outlets. Stanton told analysts on Wednesday that he sees a "world of growth in publishing" backed by those laws, and that he expects platforms to contribute amounts comparable to what they paid under their previous 2021 arrangement.

The legislative backdrop gives Nine leverage it lacked during the earlier round of deals, when voluntary agreements between tech platforms and publishers were reached under the threat of a levy rather than its actual enforcement. Think of it as the difference between a speeding fine that might be issued and one that is automatically triggered by a camera. The revamped framework introduces a more direct mechanism: platforms that do not conclude agreements face financial penalties. Stanton's public expectation that contributions will match 2021 levels sets a benchmark that will test whether Google and Meta are willing to re-engage on terms they have previously sought to minimise or exit.

Beyond platform revenues, Stanton outlined a broader strategic pivot. The company is focusing on what he called "growth assets," including QMS, while reducing exposure to "structurally challenged and smaller assets." He also flagged a "good pipeline" of AI deals after Nine signed an agreement allowing Microsoft's Copilot to access its content. That deal represents an emerging revenue stream in which publishers license their content to AI platforms for training and retrieval — a category still in its early stages but attracting growing interest from major media owners.

The financials behind Stanton's strategy are mixed. Publishing revenue was broadly flat. The streaming and broadcast unit posted a small decline, despite a record result for Stan. Nine's free-to-air television network was weighed down by a weak advertising market. The Australian Financial Review, Nine's business masthead, was spared the cost cuts and remained a robust revenue earner, a divergence between premium business journalism and the broader metropolitan newspaper market.

Nine recently announced a redundancy program at its Sydney Morning Herald and Age newsrooms after those metropolitan mastheads were hit by a prolonged advertising downturn. The cuts are part of a broader cost-out program that delivered approximately $105 million in savings during FY26, ahead of target. Of that figure, roughly $70 million was ongoing recurring savings. Total cost reductions are now expected to exceed the previous $160 million target over the three years to end FY27.

Stanton's tenure as CEO has been defined by this dual track of aggressive cost extraction and selective investment. Appointed by the board as Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, Stanton, described as an experienced media and FMCG (fast-moving consumer goods) executive, was tasked with ensuring the company did not lose momentum. The FY26 results suggest the cost discipline is delivering at the EBITDA line, even as top-line revenue growth remains elusive.

The broader context here is a media company attempting to reposition itself across three simultaneous transitions: the redistribution of value from tech platforms back to content creators through regulation, the monetisation of journalism through AI licensing, and the internal reallocation of capital from declining to growth assets. Each carries distinct risks. The bargaining laws depend on platforms choosing to comply rather than withdraw services from the Australian market, a tactic Meta employed during the original 2021 framework when it briefly blocked news content on Facebook. The AI licensing pipeline is nascent and pricing power remains untested at scale. And the shift toward outdoor digital and streaming growth comes against a backdrop of flat publishing revenue and contracting free-to-air advertising.

Stanton's willingness to articulate specific expectations for platform contributions, and to characterise publishing as a growth opportunity, signals confidence that the legislative framework will hold. Whether Google and Meta share that assessment will determine the next phase of revenue recovery for Nine's publishing division.