Politics

B.C. Conservative Exodus Continues as Teresa Wat Resigns, Citing Leader's "CCP" Remark

Graham ThorntonPublished 4h ago4 min readBased on 5 sources
Reading level
B.C. Conservative Exodus Continues as Teresa Wat Resigns, Citing Leader's "CCP" Remark
Photo by Keelan Clemens on Pexels

Teresa Wat has resigned from the B.C. Conservative Party and will sit as an Independent MLA, making her the third legislator to leave the official Opposition caucus in as many days (The Globe and Mail).

Wat, who represents Richmond-Bridgeport, said she could no longer serve under leader Kerry-Lynne Findlay. The rupture centres on what Wat described as "serious and unfounded accusations" Findlay reportedly made questioning her allegiance to Canada. According to Wat's departure statement, Findlay called Wat "CCP," a reference to the Chinese Communist Party, in remarks that were widely reported.

Wat said Findlay told her during the week of August 25 that an apology would be forthcoming. None had been issued by the time Wat announced her resignation on August 26 (The Globe and Mail).

The exodus from the B.C. Conservative caucus has been rapid. Peter Milobar departed earlier in August. Ian Paton left on August 25, and Rosalyn Bird followed on August 26. Wat's resignation came the same day as Bird's, bringing the total number of departures to four in a single month (The Globe and Mail).

The party has also lost its executive director — the top staff position responsible for the B.C. Conservatives' recent rebuilding — who departed in late July (National Observer). That departure came amid a broader round of caucus and staff shakeups that saw Findlay publicly back Wat on July 30, posting statements of support on Facebook and X (BIV). The dynamic has shifted considerably since then. Findlay's expressions of support for Wat in late July gave way, within weeks, to the breach that prompted Wat's departure.

Wat's political history adds context. She previously sat with BC United (formerly the B.C. Liberals) before crossing to the Conservatives in July 2024. At the time of that floor-crossing, BC United suggested Wat had taken sensitive voter information with her, an allegation Wat said she found disappointing (National Observer). That dispute now sits alongside the more personal conflict with Findlay, part of Wat's fractured relationship with two party leaders in just over two years.

Findlay has remained defiant through the departures, even as Bird left the caucus (Vancouver Sun). Some political analysts have said the B.C. Conservatives are at risk of collapse as MLAs exit and staff are dismissed (Vancouver Sun).

The broader context here matters regardless of how one weighs each individual's motivations. Four MLAs gone in a single month, a top organizational figure departed, and a leader who publicly endorsed one of those MLAs weeks before that same MLA walked, citing the leader's own words as the cause. The "CCP" allegation against Wat, a Chinese-Canadian legislator, and the failure to deliver a promised apology give the dispute a sharper edge in a province where Chinese-Canadian voters are a significant constituency.

For the B.C. Conservatives, the arithmetic is straightforward: every departure shrinks a caucus that holds official Opposition status — the formal role of the second-largest party in the legislature, tasked with holding the government to account — and weakens the party's standing heading into the next legislative session. The loss of the executive director who guided the party's revival compounds the institutional damage, removing the operational capacity that turned electoral gains into legislative functioning.

Wat now sits as an Independent, joining the ranks of former Conservatives and former BC United members who have chosen, at various points, to occupy the non-aligned space in the B.C. legislature. Whether any of the departing MLAs coalesce around a shared project, or whether each simply sits alone, will shape the balance of the legislature when members return.

Findlay's defiance, in the immediate term, signals no course correction. Whether that posture holds under the weight of sustained attrition is the question the party's remaining caucus and its organizational wing will have to answer.