Netanyahu's UN Address: Iran, Gaza and a Walkout in the Assembly Hall
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the general debate of the United Nations General Assembly's 81st session on 24 September 2026. The United Nations keeps an official Israel page for the session with the recording of that day's address. General Debate record The speech was also carried on UN Web TV. UN Web TV
The Assembly's published order of speakers placed Netanyahu at No. 16 on 24 September. The entry reads "His Excellency Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister." Colombia's Jose Manuel Restrepo, Vice President, was listed as No. 15 immediately before him. Portugal's Luis Montenegro, Prime Minister, was listed as No. 17 immediately after him. UN General Debate
Earlier in the same day's order, the State of Palestine was listed at No. 4. That entry reads "His Excellency Mahmoud Abbas, President." The two addresses fell hours apart in one day of debate, with a block of other national statements between them.
Delegations walked out as Netanyahu addressed the debate. UN Photo A walkout does not stop a scheduled address. It can be seen on the floor and in the official photographic record.
The address focused on Iran and defended Israel's actions in Gaza and the West Bank amid condemnation from fellow leaders. CBS News Netanyahu spoke while Israel faced ongoing conflicts in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran in September 2026. The Guardian
The broader context here is how the General Debate works as a public statement of positions, much like publishing an open letter rather than sitting down to negotiate. Speakers address the hall, and through it other capitals and audiences at home, without expecting an immediate reply. A walkout is one of the few tools delegations have to register dissent in real time. It leaves the speech in the record while denying it a full audience.
Looking at what this means for diplomats watching the day, the order itself will draw attention. Placing Palestine at No. 4 and Israel at No. 16 meant Abbas spoke first. That structure allowed each leader to present an uninterrupted account. It also allowed other leaders scheduled between and around them to respond or to sharpen competing framings. For practitioners, the question is less what was said in either speech than how foreign ministries quote and circulate those speeches afterward.
In my view, the substantive test lies outside the hall. A General Debate address centered on Iran alongside a defense of policy in Gaza and the West Bank gives other governments a clear text to answer. Condemnation voiced during debate week often hardens into draft language in committees, bilateral statements and regional forums. Supporters and critics alike will measure subsequent military decisions, aid policy and legal arguments against the positions Netanyahu placed on the record on 24 September.
