Sports

Why Manchester City's Premier League charges cannot go to CAS

Errol MayfieldPublished 6d ago2 min readBased on 11 sources
Why Manchester City's Premier League charges cannot go to CAS
Photo by Bohdan Hyrovych on Unsplash

Manchester City cannot turn to the Court of Arbitration for Sport over the Premier League's financial charges.

That door is closed. The league and its clubs have agreed that all cases between them are heard in England and Wales under English law.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport, known as CAS, is world sport's legal referee. It settles disputes that need a legal decision through independent panels of accredited arbitrators BBC. It is based in Lausanne, Switzerland, and hears more than 900 cases a year from more than 50 sports.

CAS can move fast when it has to. It sends on-site teams to events such as the summer and Winter Olympics to rule on disputes within hours.

None of that applies here. Because CAS sits in Switzerland, it is not permitted to get involved in City's Premier League case. The Premier League uses its own arbitration panel instead, and that panel is the final place a league case can be contested.

The current case was heard by an independent commission. The hearing began on 16 September 2024 and finished on 6 December, almost three months later.

On 25 September 2026, Reuters reported that reports said City had been found guilty on all but one of 115 alleged charges relating to financial rules Reuters. That outcome has not been confirmed as a final published ruling, and it is reported as a report rather than an official verdict.

For fans, this means two different tracks can confuse. City have won at CAS before, but in a separate European case.

City appealed to CAS after UEFA accused the club of breaking Financial Fair Play rules, the spending controls designed to stop clubs spending far more than they earn. City first tried to get CAS to stop UEFA's investigation. That bid failed.

The full appeal went ahead. In July 2020, CAS overturned City's two-year ban from European competition. The panel cleared the club of disguising equity funds, money from ownership, as sponsorship income.

That was UEFA versus City. This is Premier League versus City. Different organiser, different rulebook, different court.

So the history matters, but it does not set the path. Any challenge to a Premier League commission decision stays inside the English system and ends with the league's own arbitration panel.