Unions challenge FENZ restructure in the Employment Relations Authority

The Professional Firefighters' Union and the Public Service Association have asked the Employment Relations Authority to stop Fire and Emergency New Zealand's restructure.
The filing was reported on 6 October 2026. It challenges a restructure proposal launched in November. The unions asked for the proposal to be dumped. Fire and Emergency chose to restart consultation instead, according to RNZ. The Authority, the tribunal that decides employment disputes, is now asked to intervene.
The PSA alleges Fire and Emergency breached its collective agreement by failing to consult before announcing proposed job cuts. A collective agreement is the formal deal on pay and conditions. It describes the restructure as reckless and the joint action as urgent, according to the PSA. The claim centres on process. The unions say FENZ announced cuts first and consulted after, like calling for submissions after a council has already voted.
It follows an earlier block. Earlier this year the NZPFU and the PSA successfully challenged a widespread FENZ restructure. That proposal would have affected more than 160 positions, according to the NZPFU. A June Authority outcome requiring genuine consultation stalled that change. A joint filing in November 2025 also centred on failure to consult on the restructuring proposal. In September 2022 the NZPFU filed an Authority application claiming FENZ had breached good-faith bargaining obligations. In August 2020 it said its legal team had begun a process to challenge FENZ actions over Tranche 2 and 2b, which may involve further litigation.
Fire and Emergency said Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden wrote to express no confidence in chief executive Kerry Gregory. The board discussed the letter. Darryl Purdy holds the role of acting chief executive. Fire and Emergency declined RNZ's request to interview Gregory. Wattie Watson is national secretary of the Professional Firefighters' Union.
The broader context here will matter to people who manage change in the public sector. The legal test is process. The unions allege announcement before consultation. FENZ points to restarted consultation. The Authority will need to reconcile those positions. At the same time the board must manage an operational change while holding a no-confidence letter from the Internal Affairs Minister about its chief executive. That combination of employment litigation and ministerial pressure narrows room for error. Every meeting note, timeline and invitation to comment will count.


