World

Britain's Women in Education Programme Was Cancelled Before It Began. Here's Why That Matters

Elena MarquezPublished 3w ago5 min readBased on 7 sources
Reading level
Britain's Women in Education Programme Was Cancelled Before It Began. Here's Why That Matters

The UK's Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has withdrawn the tender for its Strengthening Higher Education for Female Empowerment (SHEFE) programme, ending the initiative roughly two years after its public launch, The Guardian reported on 4 July 2026.

SHEFE had a budget of £45 million for its main component and £20 million for a second, aimed at expanding higher education access for up to one million students across Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East and North Africa. It was structured as 12 cross-sector partnerships linking businesses, universities, and governments. The specific objectives were clear: increase female participation in science, technology, engineering, and maths (STEM); place more women in senior academic positions; embed gender-based violence prevention into institutional policy; align curriculum design with industry needs; and research how education affects women's job prospects and gender equality.

The programme first appeared in the FCDO's project pipeline in October 2023, then was formally announced by Deputy Foreign Secretary Andrew Mitchell at the Education World Forum on 20 May 2024. It was explicitly presented as an extension of the Strategic Partnerships for Higher Education Innovation and Reform (SPHEIR) programme — a 2016-era initiative that operated across 16 countries and served over one million students, including 12,500 refugees. Throughout 2024, SHEFE remained listed in procurement updates with the same budget figures, though no contract was ever awarded before the tender was withdrawn.

The Political Context

SHEFE arrived under the Conservative government, but Labour inherited the programme when it came to power and did not immediately cancel it. Its withdrawal in 2026 follows a broader UK government decision to cut overseas development assistance (ODA) — the budget allocated to helping poorer countries. This reduction has cascaded through the Foreign Office's education, health, and humanitarian programmes.

Labour MP Bambos Charalambous, who chairs the all-party parliamentary group on global education, stated he was "alarmed" by the cancellation and said the programme "appears to have been scrapped because of the aid cuts." His comment is the only on-record political explanation available. The FCDO has not publicly detailed its reasoning beyond confirming the tender withdrawal.

SHEFE is not the only casualty. The Guardian also reported that the FCDO cancelled a planned £150 million Education for All programme in South Sudan in early 2026. That single-country programme aimed to boost school attendance in a nation with one of the world's lowest rates. Two large withdrawals from the same office in one year — worth a combined £215 million — suggest a pattern of stepping back from planned projects, not ad-hoc decisions about particular initiatives.

What Gets Lost

Measuring the cost of a programme that never started is complicated. The one million student target was aspirational; it was never baselined, and no partner organisations were contracted. The actual fiscal loss is not £65 million spent, but the opportunity cost: planning resources absorbed, expectations raised among universities and governments in target countries, and a policy direction now reversed.

The SPHEIR precedent is useful here. That programme ran for several years, produced documented results, and built institutional capacity across 16 countries. SHEFE was explicitly designed to extend that legacy with stronger emphasis on gender and broader geographic reach. Withdrawing before signing a single contract means those partnerships will not form, leaving universities and governments in target countries with no replacement signal.

For professionals in international education financing, there is a deeper worry. Bilateral ODA commitments in higher education typically anchor multi-year institutional planning by recipient governments and universities. When a donor announces a programme publicly and through ministerial statements, partner institutions plan accordingly and allocate resources. Two tender withdrawals from the FCDO in a single year, covering programmes worth £215 million combined, will affect how partners in Africa, South Asia, and the Middle East and North Africa assess the reliability of future UK commitments.

The FCDO has not said whether it is developing a smaller alternative or whether women and girls in higher education will remain a priority within its revised ODA budget. Until that clarity arrives, the policy space is vacant.