Politics

National says super stance unchanged, but age rise missing from fiscal plan

Hana SinclairPublished 22m ago4 min readBased on 9 sources
Reading level
National says super stance unchanged, but age rise missing from fiscal plan
Photo by Doug Mountain / CC0

National says its position on superannuation has not changed, even though its fiscal plan includes no specific proposal to lift the eligibility age.

The fiscal plan is the document that sets out how the party would pay for its policies. It contains no plan to raise the age, according to RNZ. National says its stance is the same as when it criticised other parties earlier in 2026.

That was the position as reported on 12 October 2026. It follows a year in which National leaders have called for action on superannuation, while also saying they will not act without agreement from other parties.

In early May 2026, ahead of the Budget, Christopher Luxon promised National would go to the November election with a policy on superannuation and lifting the retirement age. In his State of the Nation speech in January 2026, Luxon said an ageing population made a future rise in the retirement age inevitable, according to National. By late May, during Budget 2026 coverage, that election policy had still not been released, according to RNZ.

Fiscal plan and cross-party offer

Finance Minister Nicola Willis said on TVNZ's Q+A on Sunday she would discuss the future of the retirement system with Labour through a cross-party accord, a formal agreement to work together. She promised cross-party talks on superannuation within 100 days if National forms the next government.

Luxon said change to superannuation needs political consensus, or agreement between parties, which does not exist at present. Willis has made a similar case for a joint process rather than one party acting alone. She said changes to NZ Super need to be made, but they do not need to go as far as those suggested by the OECD, according to the NZ Herald.

Her tone has been stronger at times. When she unveiled the 2026 Budget, Willis said parties that refused to act were "prepared to rob everyone under age 50 for political expediency".

On funding, government contributions to the New Zealand Superannuation Fund, the state savings fund set aside to help pay future super, are forecast at $3.1 billion over the next four years, according to National. National's KiwiSaver policy would start savings at birth for every child, according to National.

For background, National said in 2023 it would keep the super age at 65 until 2044 and keep the Winter Energy Payment, according to National. Those commitments were made before the current term and before the 2026 debate about how and when to act, and whether there is agreement to do so.

Labour, ACT and NZ First positions

Labour finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds said Labour would not raise the superannuation age from 65. Labour has promised to keep eligibility at 65. In June, Labour ruled out changing superannuation settings if elected, according to RNZ.

Edmonds also said a lower eligibility age should be considered for Māori and Pasifika people. She said National and Labour both back 6 percent employer contributions to KiwiSaver.

ACT released its own fiscal plan the day before National's, including a plan to raise the retirement age. NZ First says only New Zealand citizens would get NZ Super from 2029 if it is elected, according to 1News.

The broader context here is familiar in the Press Gallery. No government wants to carry the political cost of raising the age alone. Every government gets advice that costs will rise as the population ages. The usual response is to seek cover in consensus, an accord or a review.

Looking at what this means for the campaign, the absence in the fiscal plan counts. Like a household budget, a fiscal plan shows how promises fit with spending. With the age unchanged, spending stays on its current path. Luxon's May promise of an election policy is still open, while Willis's 100-day pledge puts the decision after the election. Voters are being asked to back talks, not a change. For Labour, holding at 65 is straightforward to campaign on, but ruling out change closes down talks before they start. The Māori and Pasifika idea and shared support for 6 percent employer KiwiSaver show where Labour sees room to move. That main question will sit with whoever forms the next government, and whether those talks happen at all.