Politics

The financial ties between Nigel Farage and a convicted US criminal

Eleanor WhitcombePublished 4w ago4 min readBased on 5 sources
Reading level
The financial ties between Nigel Farage and a convicted US criminal

Nigel Farage has been receiving substantial support from George Swinfen Cottrell — a British aristocrat and convicted federal criminal in the United States — much of which was not declared in the Register of Members' Financial Interests, the Sunday Times reported this weekend.

Cottrell, nicknamed "Posh George" by Brexit donor Arron Banks, first worked as a volunteer for Farage in 2016 at the age of 22. He was later indicted on 21 counts in the United States including money laundering — concealing the source of illegal money to make it appear legitimate — and wire fraud. He served time as a federal inmate. He has since co-authored a book titled How to Launder Money, framed as a guide for law enforcement and policymakers.

The Relationship Rebuilt

Their working relationship resumed well before the 2024 general election. According to the Sunday Times, Cottrell introduced Farage to Jack Anderton — a 25-year-old right-wing activist from Liverpool — in 2023 to manage Farage's social media presence, particularly on TikTok. Cottrell paid Anderton a salary equivalent to roughly £55,000 a year. The paper also reported that Cottrell helped negotiate a £1.5 million fee for Farage's appearance on I'm a Celebrity… Get Me Out of Here! that same year.

Cottrell additionally provided Farage with security — principally former elite soldiers — and drivers. He rented a residential property near Buckingham Palace at a cost of tens of thousands of pounds per month and allowed Farage to stay there.

When Farage announced his candidacy in the 2024 general election and took over as Reform UK leader, Cottrell was a near-constant presence at his side. The campaign launch in Clacton — where a milkshake was thrown over Farage — offered one of the more visible illustrations of that proximity. Farage was elected MP for Clacton on 4 July 2024.

What Was Declared

Only two donations from Cottrell appear in the Register of Members' Financial Interests. Farage registered a £9,253 trip to Belgium in April 2024, and a £15,276 domestic flight in the United States provided in December 2024. Nothing else is listed.

The scale of support described by the Sunday Times — security personnel, luxury accommodation, a salaried social media operative, a television deal — goes well beyond those two entries. The register requires MPs to record donations and benefits above set thresholds. The gap between what was declared and what the newspaper alleges is the central question the story raises.

A spokesman for Farage described the story as "baseless and contrived" and said "no parliamentary rules have been broken."

The Pardon Angle

One element the story investigates is Cottrell's reported lobbying of the US president for a pardon. That campaign, if confirmed, would be occurring while Cottrell maintains an active operational relationship with one of Britain's most prominent political figures. The potential leverage — or at minimum the appearance of it — that proximity to a sitting MP might provide in Washington is straightforward to assess.

openDemocracy reported in March 2025 that Cottrell had established a secretive political firm structured as an unlimited company — a legal form that carries no obligation to file accounts at Companies House. An anti-corruption expert quoted in that piece said the arrangement raised "real red flags."

The combination of these elements — a conviction for financial crimes, undisclosed support to an MP, an opaque corporate structure, and an active pardon application in a foreign jurisdiction — gives the story weight beyond a single registration question.

Farage's office has not addressed the specific allegations about accommodation, security or the Anderton salary. The Sunday Times story invites the standards authorities to look at whether the register entries are complete. Whether the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards takes up the matter is now the key question.