Wildfires, Heatwaves, and the Climate Test Facing Britain's Next Prime Minister

Smoke from two wildfires on the moors near Dovestone in Greater Manchester drifted across the region in mid-July 2026, blanketing parts of Sale, Manchester city centre, Levenshulme, and Wythenshawe in haze. This happened as Andy Burnham stood on the edge of becoming the UK's next prime minister. Firefighters were still fighting the blazes on 14 July, and health experts issued urgent advice about smoke-related air quality risks. Greater Manchester's air quality map showed only one area rated "good" during the fires. Residents reported waking to the smell of smoke as early as 3am.
The fires followed a devastating summer. The UK experienced three heatwaves in 2026. The May heatwave, from 21–29 May, killed roughly 550 people from heat-related causes, according to the Met Office. The June heatwave, from 18–28 June, killed nearly 2,200 more. The Guardian reported that extreme heat led to about 440 deaths per day at the peak of the June heatwave in England and Wales. Together, the May and June heatwaves killed about 2,700 people across England and Wales. The heatwaves also damaged harvests (another poor harvest in 2026 would be the UK's fourth since 2020), disrupted schooling, and cost businesses at least £2.4 billion in lost productivity alone.
Against this backdrop, The Guardian published a feature on 16 July 2026 examining Burnham's climate record and the decisions he will face if, as widely expected, he becomes prime minister. Carbon Brief had published a compilation two days earlier of 28 quotes from Burnham on climate change, net zero, fossil fuels, energy, and transport, offering a detailed though curated record of his public statements. (Net zero means cutting greenhouse gas emissions as close to zero as possible, with any remaining emissions balanced by removing an equivalent amount from the atmosphere.)
Burnham's credentials are local but substantive. As mayor of Greater Manchester, he set a target of reaching net zero carbon emissions by 2038, well ahead of the UK's national 2050 target. He expanded and began electrifying bus services and launched home insulation programmes. He rejected fracking for the north-west of England. (Fracking is a technique for extracting oil and gas from shale rock by injecting high-pressure fluid, which critics say can cause earthquakes and water contamination.) He has been less clear about his position on North Sea oil and gas.
Chris Venables, a campaigner and fellow at the Green Alliance thinktank, observed that Burnham "has been very quiet about the climate crisis so far" but argued that this does not mean he will water down the climate agenda. In Venables's reading, the silence is strategic rather than a sign of weak commitment. Time magazine noted on 23 June that amid a global scale-back on climate action, the UK had been increasing its ambition over the prior two years, placing the incoming prime minister in a position to either consolidate or reverse that trajectory.
The personnel signals are mixed. Ed Miliband, the current energy secretary and the government's most prominent climate champion, was being considered by Burnham for the role of chancellor of the exchequer (the UK's top finance role, responsible for government spending and taxation). Rivals briefed that Miliband lost out to home secretary Shabana Mahmood, a development some read as a potential setback to climate policy. Miliband has been the target of sustained criticism from rightwing media and politicians, making his continued presence in any senior role politically charged.
The stakes extend well beyond domestic emissions targets. A fossil fuel-driven "super El Niño" weather system was forecast. (El Niño is a periodic warming of Pacific Ocean surface temperatures that can trigger extreme weather worldwide; a "super" El Niño is an unusually intense version.) Economists warned it could cause a severe shock to global food prices lasting into 2028. The UK's joint intelligence committee found that protecting nature and tackling the energy crisis are matters of national security, a framing that elevates climate policy from an environmental portfolio to a core strategic concern.
Craig Bennett, chief executive of the Wildlife Trusts, argued that the economic and ecological crises cannot be separated. Rescuing the British economy and rescuing climate and nature, he said, are "inseparable and should be solved in a holistic, joined-up way."
The Guardian reported on 25 June that Burnham is coming under pressure from some quarters to abandon net zero targets, and that doing so could be "highly damaging on many levels."
The broader context here is that the Carbon Brief compilation and the Green Alliance assessment together paint a picture of a politician whose record is more ambitious than his recent rhetoric, a gap that the accelerating physical impacts of climate change, from moor fires to mass-casualty heatwaves, are narrowing with brutal speed.
What remains unresolved is whether Burnham will treat the climate emergency as a governing priority or a regional legacy item. His 2038 net zero target for Greater Manchester, his bus electrification programme, and his fracking opposition form a credible foundation. His silence on North Sea hydrocarbons and his apparent willingness to pass over Miliband for the Treasury suggest the boundaries of that ambition. The question is whether the events of summer 2026, with thousands dead, harvests failing, and moorlands burning, will widen those boundaries or leave them intact.


