Hamas's New Leader Khalil al-Hayya Outlines Six Priorities in First Speech

Khalil al-Hayya delivered his first speech as head of the Hamas political bureau on Wednesday, July 22, 2026, in a televised address broadcast by Hamas-run Al-Aqsa TV. Speaking from a lectern, wearing a suit jacket and open-necked shirt, with the flags of Palestine and Hamas behind him, al-Hayya laid out six priorities for the movement under his leadership, with an immediate and complete cessation of Israeli military operations in Gaza at the top of the list Al Jazeera Middle East Monitor.
The address came two days after the General Shura Council — Hamas's internal decision-making body, roughly analogous to a board of directors — selected al-Hayya as the movement's overall leader on Monday, July 20. He won the position in a run-off vote against Khaled Meshaal, the former political chief who led the bureau from 1996 to 2017 and has remained a senior figure within Hamas's external leadership. The Shura Council's choice fills a vacancy left by Yahya Sinwar, killed by the Israeli military in Gaza in 2024. Between Sinwar's death and al-Hayya's appointment, Hamas was governed by a five-man ruling council, of which al-Hayya was a member Al Jazeera.
The leadership transition carries personal as well as political weight. Al-Hayya's son, Azzam al-Hayya, died on May 7, 2026, from wounds sustained in an Israeli attack the previous night, roughly two months before his father assumed the movement's top post Reuters.
In the speech, al-Hayya reaffirmed Hamas's stated objective of a Palestinian state encompassing Gaza, the Israeli-occupied West Bank, and East Jerusalem as its capital, the position codified in the movement's revised 2017 policy document. He promised that Hamas would work to alleviate suffering in Gaza, thwart displacement plots, and accelerate reconstruction efforts. He also thanked countries that are trying to end Israel's war Al Jazeera.
Al-Hayya devoted a portion of the address to Palestinians in Jerusalem and the West Bank, calling Jerusalem the "compass and heart of our struggle." The direct appeal to West Bank and Jerusalem audiences frames the movement's territorial claims in unified terms rather than as a Gaza-centric agenda Al Jazeera.
The broader context here is one of institutional consolidation after a prolonged leadership vacuum. Sinwar's killing in 2024 removed not only Hamas's political chief but the architect of the October 7, 2023 operations. The five-man council that governed in the interim was widely understood as a stopgap mechanism necessitated by Israel's campaign of targeted killings against the movement's senior ranks. The Shura Council's decision to restore a single-leader structure, and the run-off contest between al-Hayya and Meshaal, suggest an internal debate over direction. Al-Hayya, a Gaza-based figure with deep ties to the movement's military and political apparatus, prevailed over Meshaal, whose base of operations has long been external. The outcome points toward continuity of the Gaza-centric leadership model that Sinwar embodied.
The six-priority framework al-Hayya presented also functions as a messaging tool. By structuring the speech around concrete deliverables — ending the offensive, alleviating suffering, reconstruction, resisting displacement, the Jerusalem question, and the broader national project — the new leader is positioning Hamas as a governing and nationalist actor rather than a purely military organization. This framing aligns with the 2017 policy document's attempt to separate Hamas's political ambitions from its armed resistance posture.
How much room al-Hayya has to act on these priorities remains constrained by conditions on the ground. The movement's military capacity has been degraded by nearly two years of Israeli operations, its governance infrastructure in Gaza is shattered, and any reconstruction effort will depend on conditions set by Israel, Egypt, and international donors. The expression of gratitude to countries working to end the war suggests an openness to external mediation, but the speech offered no specific diplomatic proposals or ceasefire terms.
For regional actors and mediators, al-Hayya's ascent consolidates a counterpart with whom to engage. The run-off result indicates that the Shura Council favored continuity with the Sinwar-era political line over a potential recalibration under Meshaal. Whether that translates into movement on hostage negotiations, ceasefire frameworks, or post-conflict governance arrangements will depend on factors well beyond the content of this inaugural address.


