World

Iran Says No US Talks Are Underway, Even as Both Sides Face a 60-Day Deadline

Elena MarquezPublished 5d ago5 min readBased on 14 sources
Reading level
Iran Says No US Talks Are Underway, Even as Both Sides Face a 60-Day Deadline
Image by Bergadder from Pixabay

Iran's Foreign Ministry said on August 3, 2026, that it is not currently holding any talks with the United States, pushing back against suggestions from Washington that negotiations toward a final deal were close. The statement, delivered by Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei, came as Tehran confirmed it is in discussions with Oman over establishing a temporary safe route through the Strait of Hormuz, with designated entry and exit lanes (Reuters; Al Jazeera).

The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman through which roughly a fifth of the world's oil supply normally passes. Closing it, as happened after US and Israeli strikes in February 2026, effectively chokes off one of the most important energy shipping lanes on the planet (Reuters).

The denial of active US-Iran talks cuts against the trajectory set by a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) — a non-binding diplomatic agreement — signed in June 2026 between the two countries. That MOU commits both parties to negotiating and achieving a final deal within a maximum of 60 days, with the option to extend (Iranian MFA). The White House's official achievements page lists the MOU as a historic agreement and states that the Strait of Hormuz was fully reopened as part of the same diplomatic process (White House. Iran, however, has consistently tempered that framing, saying as recently as July 27 that no final decision had been made on the deal President Trump hoped could be signed soon, and that Iran still controls the Strait of Hormuz (Reuters.

The United States demanded Iran stop attacks in the strait, and Washington said the waterway would be opened as part of a peace deal (Reuters; Reuters. Trump said there was broad regional approval for a US-Iran deal and that the two countries had agreed to continue talks after a ceasefire — a halt to fighting agreed by both sides (Reuters. But Trump's assertion that a deal would be signed on a Sunday was swiftly denied by Iran, which said the signing would not take place so soon (Reuters.

In parallel with the stalled US track, Iran has been conducting technical talks with Oman on the Strait of Hormuz. Several rounds of deputy-level negotiations have been held in Tehran (Iranian MFA). An Iranian official said the Strait of Hormuz will never return to its pre-war situation, signalling that whatever arrangement emerges will involve new operational parameters rather than a simple return to how things worked before the conflict (ABC News. Iran's discussions with Oman over a temporary safe route, with structured entry and exit lanes, appear to be the practical result of that position.

Iran's diplomatic posture has also been shaped by direct military friction with the United States. On July 13, Iran's Foreign Ministry issued a statement condemning what it described as US military aggression against Iran, reaffirming Tehran's determination to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity and condemning US interference in implementing arrangements in the Strait of Hormuz (Iranian MFA. That statement followed earlier remarks by Iran's ambassador at a UN General Assembly meeting addressing the vetoing of a draft resolution tabled by Bahrain — meaning Bahrain had proposed a formal UN position that was blocked (Iranian MFA, New York).

The broader context here is one of two fundamentally different readings of the same document. Tehran urges the US to honour the MOU's commitments (Al Jazeera, yet simultaneously says no talks are underway. Washington, for its part, has described the MOU as a breakthrough and listed the strait as reopened. The gap between a signed memorandum and a working, mutually trusted arrangement on the water is wide, and whether the MOU's 60-day window can close that gap is an open question.

Oman's role as intermediary is not new to Gulf diplomacy, but the technical specificity of the current talks — deputy-level rounds focused on lane structures and safe passage protocols — suggests movement from broad mediation toward concrete maritime management. Whether that bilateral Iran-Oman track can substitute for a stalled US-Iran process, or simply run alongside it as a fallback, is the central question for regional maritime security in the weeks ahead.