World

A Solo Show in Budapest Revisits Hungary's Authoritarian Past as Politics Shift

Elena MarquezPublished 2d ago4 min readBased on 9 sources
Reading level
A Solo Show in Budapest Revisits Hungary's Authoritarian Past as Politics Shift
Photo by Pohárnok Gergely / CC BY-SA 4.0

A one-woman show in Budapest about the dangers of authoritarian rule is based on a memoir by Hungarian-American writer Kati Marton. New York Times

The production adapts Enemies of the People: My Family's Journey to America for the stage. Erika Marozsan plays the lead role. AOL The staging is spare. One actor carries a family history from state surveillance, or close monitoring by police, to exile, or forced departure.

Marton was a young child in Budapest during the Hungarian revolution of 1956, an uprising against Soviet-backed control. New York Times She later read her parents' secret police files to research Enemies of the People, an account of their imprisonment in Stalinist Hungary, when Hungary was under strict Soviet-style control. New York Times She also wrote the New York Times Opinion essay titled "Hungary's Authoritarian Descent." New York Times

To understand why that history carries weight in Budapest, consider her path. A writer shaped by 1956, working from secret police archives, warned a decade ago about authoritarian practices in Hungary. Now that warning, filtered through family memory, is spoken aloud by a single performer in the same city where the events began.

Viktor Orban appeared in Budapest on July 22, 2026 as former Hungarian prime minister. Reuters Connect He urged his supporters to stand up against what he called PM Magyar's tyranny. Reuters Hungarian firms and business magnates who used ties to Orban to build large empires are shifting to smaller projects as a new political era takes hold. Reuters

On Sept. 15, Hungary's government submitted a bill to roll back Orban-era anti-LGBTQ+ rules. Reuters The filing is a proposal. It revises the written law, or statute. It does not by itself change enforcement or daily practice.

The broader context here is sequencing. Legal revision, business repositioning and cultural re-examination are moving in parallel, at different speeds. A bill can be filed in a day, like a blueprint drawn overnight. Business networks take months to reprice risk and relationships. Theatre works on another level, testing what language the public will accept for coercion, complicity and resistance.

For observers of political transition, the stage offers an early clue. Lawmakers show direction through drafts. Former leaders show posture through press conferences. Former clients show calculation through deal size. Artists show permission. A memoir rooted in Stalinist imprisonment, performed solo, suggests direct discussion of state power is again possible in mainstream culture.

In my view, the choice of source material sharpens that signal. This is not invented dystopia. It is family history built from police files, tied to 1956 and to a later essay on authoritarian descent. The question to watch is whether institutional change follows cultural candor, or stalls beside it. Budapest has entered that stretch where bills are filed, ambitions shrink, and one voice on stage recounts what surveillance once cost one family.