Finance

Oracle's $18 Billion Project-Loan Strain: What Backlog Can't Pay For

Marcus SterlingPublished 2w ago5 min readBased on 20 sources
Reading level
Oracle's $18 Billion Project-Loan Strain: What Backlog Can't Pay For
source:oracle.com

About $18 billion in loans tied to an Oracle-leased data center in New Mexico came under pressure, according to a report published Sept. 18. The stress sits in project-level debt, which means loans tied to that one campus and its lease payments. It is not in Oracle corporate bonds, which are borrowings issued by Oracle itself.

The broader context here is who takes the first hit. If that campus runs short, the project lenders absorb losses before Oracle's own bondholders do. Ordinary savers still feel it indirectly, because trouble in project loans can raise Oracle's cost of borrowing next time.

Oracle shares had slumped more than 21% in 2026 as of Sept. 10, then rose 4% in extended trading after Oracle reported a jump in revenue backlog. Reuters Backlog means contracted future revenue, or sales customers have promised but not yet paid for.

In my view, that 4% bounce needs careful reading. The market treated the backlog as cover for heavy near-term spending on buildings and equipment, known as capex. Promised revenue does not pay this quarter's concrete bill.

Funding strain moves to the loan book

Oracle said it expected to raise between $45 billion and $50 billion in calendar 2026. Reuters The money would help fund AI data-center buildout alongside operating cash flow and lease structures, where outside developers build and Oracle rents.

What this means for ordinary investors here is straightforward. A raise that large points to heavy use of outside money, not cash from daily business. Think of it like a household build that needs a large mortgage on top of wages.

Related Digital was finalizing $16 billion of financing for a large Oracle data center after months of stop-and-start negotiations. Bloomberg

In practical terms, that stop-and-start path points to lender caution. Tenor means the length of the loan. Pricing means the interest charged. Residual risk means the fear a highly specialized building is worth less if Oracle ever leaves.

Oracle shares plunged by the most in almost 11 months after the company escalated spending on AI data centers amid weak cloud sales. Bloomberg Then Oracle reported quarterly capital expenses that were higher than estimates. Shares declined by the most in six months after that print. Bloomberg

Shares had fallen over 24% so far in 2026 as of April 6. Oracle stock then fell 19% in the week ending June 26. That was its worst week since 2001 as investors dwelled on finances. CNBC Headcount shrank 13% to 141,000 employees in fiscal 2026.

For anyone watching jobs and budgets, that cut stands out. A 13% staff reduction rarely comes with a comfortable balance sheet.

A buildout running late and over budget

Some Oracle data centers for OpenAI were delayed to 2028 from 2027. The delays were attributed to labor and material shortages. Bloomberg Oracle denied a media report that it was delaying OpenAI-related data centers. The denial and the delay report both date to Dec. 12, 2025.

In my view, investors are left to weigh two things. One is company guidance. The other is third-party reporting. Both point to the same date, but not the same story.

Oracle stock slumped nearly 5% after a report that a $10 billion data center was in limbo after talks stalled. Investor's Business Daily Separately, Oracle's largest data center partner Blue Owl Capital will not provide funding for a $10 billion deal to build its next facility.

The broader implication here is execution risk. Losing an anchor funding partner forces Oracle to find replacement debt or equity, accept new pricing, or accept delay.

A gas pipeline for a proposed Oracle AI data center was delayed by nearly six months to 2027, with an estimated in-service date of Feb. 1, 2027. Bloomberg Oracle's data-center warning cited risks including data centers taking longer to build than expected, supply-chain problems, and potential increases in energy costs.

Oracle announced an investment in more than 1.7 GW of carbon-free electricity to support AI growth and strengthen the Texas grid, with a goal of 100 percent carbon-free electricity for AI data centers and wind projects to supply renewable power to ERCOT. It reported it had delivered 75% of total capacity as of September 2026, with the remainder delivering in subsequent quarters. Oracle and Vantage also launched a campaign on Sept. 17, 2026 focused on commitments to Wisconsin for the Project Lighthouse data center campus in Port Washington, Wisconsin, which Oracle stated has an $11 billion projected economic impact.

The broader context here is capital structure, not just construction. Oracle is leasing large-scale capacity developed and financed by third parties. Lenders judge the lease, the completion guarantees, power delivery and the resale value of a specialized asset. Spreads, the extra interest lenders charge over safe rates, move first when any leg slips. That appears to be what happened in New Mexico.

In my view, the backlog pop and the loan pressure can both be true. Remaining performance obligation supports future revenue recognition. It does not fund concrete poured this quarter. If spending leads cash collection by several quarters, the bridge must come from funded debt, project debt, or selling new shares. Job cuts help operating profit. They do not close a multi-billion funding gap.

Looking at what this means for credit investors, three variables now dominate. First, cost to complete versus committed financing on each campus. Second, lease start dates relative to interest capitalization, where interest is added to building cost until rent begins. Third, power connection and fuel supply, as shown by the pipeline shift to 2027 and the Texas wind purchase. Slippage on any of the three extends the period of negative free cash flow, when more cash goes out than comes in, and widens the required raise implied by the $45 billion to $50 billion calendar 2026 figure.

The takeaway for savers here is simple. The stock market noticed the funding risk early. The loan market is now sending its own signal.